The Shack – Dangerous theology with more than a little Aleister Crowley

A different gospel 5 comments

n 2007 William Paul Young published a novel called The Shack. To date more than 20 million English language copies have been sold. The book has been recommended by evangelicals and non-Christians. Defenders of The Shack such as Baptist evangelist Kent Hovind claim that “it’s just a story” and ridicule those who try to suggest otherwise. Even the author Stephen King has recommended this “life changing” book.

Is The Shack just a book? Are its critics just a bunch of gnat-straining hotheads?

Paul Flynn’s documentary


aul Flynn has examined the issues of The Shack thoroughly, and has come to these conclusions:

  1. The Shack is explicitly theological in nature. In interviews, William Paul Young states repeatedly that he is teaching theology through the story.
  2. The Shack constitutes a direct attack upon Sola Scriptura, the foundational truth of the Reformation.

  3. The Shack presents blasphemous representations of God, in violation of the Second and Third Commandments.

  4. William Paul Young presents a false view of the Trinity, including the idea that the Father became incarnate and was crucified. This view has been known since the third century as the heresy of modalism.

  5. The Shack presents heresies about Jesus Christ and the cross, denying the judicial substitutionary atonement.

  6. The Shack suggests the teaching of Universalism, that all human beings will be saved.

  7. William Paul Young does not believe in the Biblical doctrine of eternal hell. Rather he teaches that hell is “restorative”, a type of purgatory.

The gospel of Aleister Crowley


he “good news” according to The Shack is that people don’t have to follow any rules, as there are no rules. All men have been redeemed regardless of faith or repentance.

Paul Flynn doesn’t make the obvious comparison. But anyone familiar with the works of Aleister Crowley, the self-proclaimed wickedest man in the world, will recognize William Paul Young’s version of the gospel as the Thelemic core doctrine:

Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.


Aleister Crowley Satanist

Aleister Crowley – teacher of William Paul Young?

Do you really think God is okay with a book which makes the good news of Jesus Christ equivalent to that of the foremost Satanist of the Twentieth Century?

The Shack: Its Dangerous Theology and Error (full documentary)

Thanks to Maria of Pilgrim’s Progress Revisited for calling attention to Paul Flynn’s documentary, which Paul has graciously provided for free viewing.

We worship one God in Trinity, and Trinity in Unity; Neither confounding the persons nor dividing the substance. For there is one person of the Father, another of the Son, and another of the Holy Spirit. but the Godhead of the Father, of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit is all one, the glory equal, the majesty coeternal. Such as the Father is, such is the son, and such is the holy spirit. -The Athanasian Creed

“And the LORD spake unto you out of the midst of the fire: ye heard the voice of the words, but saw no similitude; only [ye heard] a voice. And he declared unto you his covenant, which he commanded you to perform, [even] ten commandments; and he wrote them upon two tables of stone. And the LORD commanded me at that time to teach you statutes and judgments, that ye might do them in the land whither ye go over to possess it. Take ye therefore good heed unto yourselves; for ye saw no manner of similitude on the day [that] the LORD spake unto you in Horeb out of the midst of the fire: Lest ye corrupt [yourselves], and make you a graven image, the similitude of any figure, the likeness of male or female,” (Deuteronomy 4:12-16)


Dear Lord, thank you. You are the alpha and omega, the beginning and the end. Your truth stands eternal. Your word can never be shaken. Please protect your sheep. Separate us now and forever from the goats. And continue to save. For Jesus Christ’s sake, and in his name. Be glorified today. Amen.

© 2017 Alec Satin. All rights reserved. Ask before copying.


Alec Satin

Christian man waiting for the Lord's return. Wholeheartedly subscribes to the Augsburg Confession and Book of Concord. Appreciates craftsmanship and things done with care, especially God's workmanship in the animals of His creation. He's most of all grateful for Christ's love, which he finds increasingly hard to understand. Hopes with this site to encourage everyone to put their trust in Christ alone which is the only way to be reconciled with the one true God.

5 comments… add one
  • Maria, a gentle iconoclast 12 Jun 2016, 7:13 am Link

    Alec, thank you for taking this up and going further than I am able!

    • Alec Satin 12 Jun 2016, 7:21 am Link

      Hi Maria.
      I had hoped to never again have to think about “The Shack”. But just like the other occultist darlings, the Harry Potter series of books, “The Shack” keeps working its poisonous spell throughout America and the world. It’s pure Satanism seen through a Christian veil.
      God help us.
      (And he is, praised be his name.)

      Be well, Maria, and thank you again for bringing attention to this obscure documentary.


  • Timothy J. Hammons 12 Jun 2016, 9:01 am Link

    It’s funny, but when Heidi and I were both single, and on Christian Mingle where we met, if someone wrote that they really liked The Shack, that was a clear indicator that we didn’t want anything to do with them.

    We actually met because I wrote in my profile that I was looking for a woman who knew what the chief end of man was, and she responded by asking me if I held to the Westminster Confession of Faith, and did I take an exceptions. 🙂

  • Glenn E. Chatfield 12 Jun 2016, 2:51 pm Link

    If we can get enough blogs with this information, perhaps the sales of “The Shack” will decline!


Commenting is a privilege, not a right. Act like an adult. Show manners. Be respectful. Use your real name.


%d bloggers like this: